Comments on: Class::Accessor can has “has”

By: 開発日記 » アクセサを作るモジュールをゴニョゴニョ。

開発日記 » アクセサを作るモジュールをゴニョゴニョ。 — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:21:36 +0000

[...] こんな感じでMooseの書き方も出来るけど、is指定が好きじゃない。正味、読み書き両方出来るのだけで良い。 [...]

By: Marty

Marty — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:48:35 +0000

It hasn’t gone away.

By: mxey

mxey — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:14:18 +0000

Actually I like the classic Class::Accessor API better ;)

By: 開発日記 » Class::AccessorがMooseスタイルに対応したらしい

開発日記 » Class::AccessorがMooseスタイルに対応したらしい — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:54:53 +0000

[...] Class::Accessor can has “has” — バカな火星人 YAPCでdisられたから対応したとかなんとか Class::Accessor のインターフェイスがあんまり好きじゃなかったんだけども、素敵になったので様子見て使おうと思う。今は、モジュール使わずにそのまま書いてるんです＞＜ [...]

By: Marty

Marty — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:26:22 +0000

Calling has in a loop should work.

By: Marty

Marty — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:25:20 +0000

You can also say use Class::Accessor 'Moose-like'; if you want to.

By: Shawn M Moore

Shawn M Moore — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:39:42 +0000

Oh damn. I would have been more diplomatic if I had known you were the maintainer of Class::Accessor. But then again, it worked, so.. cheers! :)

By: Adam Kennedy

Adam Kennedy — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:53:41 +0000

Unless you know the in-jokes, “antlers” makes no sense at all. Recommend just using something more like ‘Moose’ or whatever.

By: Yuval Kogman

Yuval Kogman — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:03:02 +0000

FWIW, If you want to go the other way (run on Moose but use C::A syntax instead of the other way around), the MooseX::Emulate::Class::Accessor::Fast module provides a compatible API (it was developed so that old Catalyst code could run on Moose unmodified).

By: brunov

brunov — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:45:57 +0000

Cool! Does it also support the following?

has $_ => ( is => ‘ro’ ) for qw(foo bar baz);

Because that would be cool too.