<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightning Talks: Would I be brave enough to give one?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martian.org/karen/2008/02/02/lightning-talks-would-i-be-brave-enough-to-give-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martian.org/karen/2008/02/02/lightning-talks-would-i-be-brave-enough-to-give-one/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbie</title>
		<link>http://martian.org/karen/2008/02/02/lightning-talks-would-i-be-brave-enough-to-give-one/comment-page-1/#comment-19250</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martian.org/karen/2008/02/02/lightning-talks-would-i-be-brave-enough-to-give-one/#comment-19250</guid>
		<description>This was something I took up with Geoff and Thomas, after Houston, in an attempt to think ahead for Vienna. 

Firstly, I suggested having a separate session for new speakers, slotted in amongst regular talks, so that the speakers don&#039;t feel so intimidated. Secondly, I suggested that serious topics are held at the beginning of the session, and purposefully humourous ones are saved to the end of the session. 

Paul&#039;s talk in Houston was fantastic and with the comedy talks around him, it lessened the impact of his talk. I really hope Paul decides to submit a full talk based on his lightning talk for Chicago, as it really does warrant a more indepth talk.

The current expectation in the audience is that they are going to be entertained, and while I have nothing against some light hearted talks during the conference, there should definitely be a session be allocated for new speakers and serious talks. Speaking in front of 300+ people, who are all expecting you to be funny, is giving the wrong message to speakers of the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was something I took up with Geoff and Thomas, after Houston, in an attempt to think ahead for Vienna. </p>
<p>Firstly, I suggested having a separate session for new speakers, slotted in amongst regular talks, so that the speakers don&#8217;t feel so intimidated. Secondly, I suggested that serious topics are held at the beginning of the session, and purposefully humourous ones are saved to the end of the session. </p>
<p>Paul&#8217;s talk in Houston was fantastic and with the comedy talks around him, it lessened the impact of his talk. I really hope Paul decides to submit a full talk based on his lightning talk for Chicago, as it really does warrant a more indepth talk.</p>
<p>The current expectation in the audience is that they are going to be entertained, and while I have nothing against some light hearted talks during the conference, there should definitely be a session be allocated for new speakers and serious talks. Speaking in front of 300+ people, who are all expecting you to be funny, is giving the wrong message to speakers of the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

